Library clips

sharing ideas thoughts and feedback

May 16, 2008

When re-purposing email is difficult

Luis Suarez is creating a wave of interest in his self administered email detox rehab program ;)

He links to one of my posts on examples of re-purposing email, in this post I want to talk about more tricky situations.

Invites

Blogs, wikis, and forums enable us to work socially and keep up to date using RSS Readers.

But email still has to be used to invite people to a new forum, a new blogger on the block, a new wiki set-up for an event, etc…

Luis talks about email just being for one-to-one sensitive correspondence…well invites are not sensitive and you’d want to broadcast an invite to a lot of people. So what to do?

Email is not alone here, blasting a private message to a list in your Facebook private messages is no different.

Although it is slightly different if you blast a private message within a topic community, this is like having numerous email inboxes, one for each community, and they each live at the community site.
But still with lots of inboxes you need some sort of dashboard to be notified on what’s going on, is email this dashboard, most of the time yes.

What I can think of is for each community or business unit to have a news blog, this blog can announce an invite to a new blog, wiki event, etc… This is the only way I see of bypassing email.

But what if that invite to a new wiki event is only intended for a few people in the community, the rest of the members have to put up with seeing the blog post even though is doesn’t really concern them.
You wouldn’t have got this occupational spam using email as it wouldn’t of been sent to non-relevant people, in this case a blog is causing more occupational spam in your RSS Reader, than spam in your email inbox.
This is the whole reason for my post on mesh blogs.

Tasks

My idea of mesh blogs also applied to tasks. Since a mesh blog is a specific blog set up for a two way audience, a member of one sub-team can post tasks to this blog without feeling they are spamming other sub-teams. The recipient can leave comments or create new posts to the sender as clarification, status, etc…

But what happens when the task is only for one or two people?

If a task was posted in a mesh blog for the support and tech team to communicate, then the one member of the tech team (sender) and the one or two members (recipients) of the support team are not going to be the only people who get this post. All members of both these sub-teams will get this post plus subsequent posts.

The only answer I can see is setting up a blog for each task, this way you don’t need to spam anyone.

Like Luis says, you could use a wiki, forum, or a blog for tasks. If it was a bigger task you could have a community or room so you can use all these tools.

In the end these are better than email as you can collaborate easier and it’s centralised in an open archive, rather than email siloes. This documented trail is knowledge sharing by doing work, there is no extra effort in having to think and share your knowledge for the greater good…and hopefully others can see your documented activity and re-use it, rather than re-inventing the wheel.

But why not use a task management tool to do the job, such as Lotus Connections (Activities)…I’d like to hear Luis’s progress on this addition to his program.

Anyway, whatever system is used, the idea is to use an RSS Reader for progress updates, or the dashboard widget itself.

On-the-fly conversation

The idea of a task is a unique communication between two or more parties to get a job done. An existing channel like a blog or wiki may not exist for this task, so a new one may need to be created, no matter how small or temporarily.

I find on-the-fly conversations in a very similar area.
In a past post I explained the difficulty in using existing blogs or forums to have a discussion that may only last 2 or 3 back and forth communications.
Basically you only want specific people to be in the discussion (perhaps privacy or simply courtesy of not spamming them), and setting up a forum for a very brief discussion can seem too much compared to sending an email.

But as mentioned earlier, at least the discussion can be re-used by others as it is visible.

I think in this situation email could be used if setting up a forum is too much work, unless the first email you send automatically sets up the forum. And subsequent back and forth emails are threaded into the open forum. With this system you can still use email for the discussion as it’s posted to a public space at the same time, or you could just go to that public space and post there, and subscribe to the feed for updates.

I covered this in a blog post a long time ago, once of the tools that seems to fit the bill is 9cays.

Basically you email people and 9cays…9cays will send people an email invite. When the reply to emails it will also appear at an public or private space, and this space is pretty much one blog post and comments.

Hmm, 9cays could be used for tasks.

Email the task to a worker and 9cays, and then just back and forth discuss via email or at the blog post comments, in the end you have a central place to house this (yeah for no email silos).

Rooms

Either a task or an on-the-fly forum, I think, is seen as it’s own thing. It may not be related to a community, but you still need to be able to use social community tools.
I feel that templates that are used to set up a community can be stripped down to a basic template to serve task requirements. And unlike a community, you would not need to request a task (room) space, any user can just set one up in one click.
Setting up a task room needs to be as accessible and easy as sending an email, otherwise people won’t use them.

So next time a few others and yourself have a task, don’t use email, instead set up a room in one click. You will have an instant blog, forum, wiki and document folder to do your work.
Others can eavesdrop, subscribe to or visit your room to keep in the loop.

Next time someone needs to do a similar task (perhaps the person who did the original task has left the company), they can re-use the knowledge that lives in the task room.

Next time you come off a cross business unit conference call and want to keep the discussion going online for about 2 weeks, don’t worry about trying to find the right CoP to use, just set up a room.

Yeah, no email siloes.

Plus the task information you are going to re-use isn’t just a deliverable, it includes all the workings out from blog posts, forum discussions, and wiki collaborations…now that’s tacitastic!

The reason I’m harping on about tasks is that sure you can get people using communities to do work rather than email silos, but quite often work is done as a task by just a few people…and your communications and collaborations in a community may feel like you are spamming these people.

At our work we are starting to use communities to leverage the social captial and get away from email, but I’m finding task work is still done in email, that’s why I see “rooms” (with social tools) as another way to use tools that are more appropriate than email.

For those of you who love email, please adhere to two.sentenc.es

May 9, 2008

Examples of re-purposing email

In a past post I talked about Re-purposing email, and after that I was going to give some examples, but I got sidetracked on what blogs an enterprise would have when it would come to communications, see Enterprise blog channels for communications.

If these examples seem universal, then perhaps we can start a “Re-purposing email wiki”…I’m sure Luis Suarez would agree.

Emails are not just about communications, sometimes they are about collanoration, tasks, sharing tips, etc…

This post is not just focusing on communication type blog posts, in fact it’s not focusing on blogs at all. It’s going through example emails and proposing how that email could be re-purposed.

What I have done is listed the email under the social tool it could of been delivered in.
Any notes have been denoted by an (*).

BLOG (team/project/personal/office-wide/community)

Announce

To:OFFICE-WIDE
From:IT
A new security patch on 25-12-07 will be implemented when you login, please let the PC do it’s thing

* This is an easy one, the general IT Office blog

To:OFFICE TEAM LEADS
From:Training Lead
We are running courses, on Access database training, please ask your team members if they are interested.

* All my boss would have to do is publish a blog post on our Team blog pointing to the post on the Corporate Training blog
- this would work as she would be subscribed to the CorporateTraining blog, and we would be subscribed to the Team blog
- in fact if I came across the training blog post (if I had access), I could potentially know before she even told me

To:TEAM and 2 other closely related teams
From: TEAM LEADER
A new banner and overview sheet has been included in our toolkit.
Please let others know.

* Perhaps this could be posted to our Team External blog, where we publish stuff that other team leads can see
- since our team and other team leads subscribe to this blog we will all be in the know
- each team lead can then let their members know by posting a brief blog post on their Team blogs, pointing to our TeamExternal blog.

To:OFFICE-WIDE
From:IT
There is now a colour printer in the office

* This is an easy one, the general IT Office blog

To:OFFICE-WIDE
From:Admin
Please welcome the new global manager for “social software” (hehe)

* This is an easy one, the general Office blog

To:PROJECT TEAM
From: A Project unit manager
The new project workspace has been set up at this URL.
Here is the getting started overview.

* This is an easy one, the general Project blog

To:TEAM
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
Here are the usage statistics for December

* This could be published on the Team blog
- then again this may be of no value to the Development team, or another sub-team, this is what lead me to my post on mesh blogs

To:OFFICE-WIDE
From:Admin
The trains are on strike this afternoon, you will need to make alternate arrangements

* This is an easy one, the general Office blog

To:OFFICE-WIDE
From:Admin
A staff member was mentioned in the national newspaper today for a job well done on one of our projects

* This is an easy one, the general Office blog

To:PROJECT TEAM
From: A Project unit manager
Our main repository does not support media files, please assist clients by using this alternative

* This is an easy one, the general Project blog

Status

To:OFFICE-WIDE
From:IT
We are having problems with internet access, we are speaking to our providers to resolve this

* This is an easy one, the general IT Office blog

To:OFFICE-WIDE
From:IT
The internet is now working

* This is an easy one, the general IT Office blog

Work

To:SUB-TEAM
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
If anyone is interested, here is a workaround to this problem

* Perhaps this could be posted to a Sub-Team blog,
- other sub-teams in the team can subscribe if they like

To:SUB-TEAM
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
The solution to this issue was a setting in Outlook

* Perhaps this could be posted to a Sub-Team blog,
- other sub-teams in the team can subscribe if they like

To:TEAM
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
I’m finding I’m learning a lot about our industry in Africa from my work on this deliverable….

* Perhaps this could be posted to a Sub-Team blog or personal blog
- others can subscribe if they like

FORUM (team/project/personal/office-wide/community)

Question

To:OFFICE-WIDE
From:Admin
We are looking for someone to offer their expertise on….

* Perhaps this could posted in a few community forums
- this way the whole office is not spammed

To:TEAM
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
Does anyone know how to do this excel formula…

* Perhaps this could posted to your team forum
- otherwise search for an excel or Office tips community that may have an excel wiki or excel blog

To:TEAM
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
Where can I find a file for our team logo?

* Perhaps this could posted to your team forum
- or IM blast a portion of your network

To:TEAM
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
What do people think of Windows Vista, what are your experiences?

* Perhaps this could posted to your team forum, or a community forum, it depends which audience you want to ask

To:TEAM
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
Where would I find information on…

* Perhaps this could posted to your team forum, or a community forum, it depends which audience you want to ask

To:PROJECT TEAM
From:1 PROJECT TEAM MEMBER
Does anyone want to car pool, I live outer eastern suburbs?

* Perhaps this could posted to the project forum, or the office forum, it depends which audience you want to ask
- or IM blast a portion of your network

IM

To:WORKER
From:WORKER
Can I use the Adobe writer on your computer?

* This is a quick question that can easily be done in IM, rather than an email in each inbox

To:WORKER
From:WORKER
I forgot to ask you was it cold when you were just outside…I’m about to go out.

* This is a quick question that can easily be done in IM, rather than an email in each inbox

To:WORKER
From:WORKER
The conference is about to start, where are you?

* This is a quick question that can easily be done in IM, rather than an email in each inbox

To:WORKER
From:WORKER
Are you free for a chat, I have 3 others that are free now.

* This is a quick question that can easily be done in IM, rather than an email in each inbox

WIKI

Collaborate

To:4 TEAM MEMBERS
From:TEAM LEADER
Can you all make a list of issues and email them to me and I will put them in one big list

* This could be a wiki task, see my post

To:4 TEAM MEMBERS
From:WORKER
Can you all review this attachment and send me the changes

* This could be a wiki task

To:4 TEAM MEMBERS
From:WORKER
Sorry, here’s another addition to the meeting agenda

* This could easily be added to the meeting agenda wikipage without emailing people

Knowledgebase

To:7 TEAM MEMBERS
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
If anyone is interested, here is a workaround to this problem

* This could easily be added to the solutions wiki
- or perhaps Tips and Tricks blog

To:7 TEAM MEMBERS
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
I can’t find the documentation on…where is it kept

* This wouldn’t happen if there was a centralised team wiki or a wiki that lists documents in the repository
- otherwise ask the question in the team forums

To:7 TEAM MEMBERS
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
When you load this in the database remember to change this element as the template is not yet fixed.
This is not documented in the procedures.

* This is a reply-email to someone who didn’t need to send the email request if there was a Workarounds wiki or blog
- otherwise ask the question in the team forums

Event

To:7 TEAM MEMBERS
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
I can’t find the email for when that workshop is taking place

* This wouldn’t happen if there was an Event wiki
- otherwise ask the question in the forums

To:TEAM
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
The workshop is kicking off today.
Here is the agenda.
This person cannot make it.
I will further email you the presentation attachments

* This wouldn’t happen if there was an Event wiki, with a wiki blog
- perhaps a community could be set-up for the workshop

Task

To: SUB-TEAM
From: 1 TEAM MEMBER
Could everyone please sign off that the new features have been tested and work

* This could be a wiki task, and perhaps posted on the wiki task blog
- rather than once person sending out an email to about 10 people with an attachment
- then each person sending back an email to say they have actioned it

To:7 TEAM MEMBERS
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
The test server will be going down for 3 days to be patched.
I will let you know the moment it is back up

* This could perhaps be posted on the wiki task blog
- or if it’s part of a bigger picture like a project where the wiki and blog could be in a community

To:3 TEAM MEMBERS
From:1 TEAM MEMBER
I am currently at stage 3 of my report, I’m now doing field research for stage 4.
Tomorrow I will fly to China, and need to find accomodation.
I will meet with client and let you know of the results.

* This could perhaps be posted on the wiki task blog
- or if it’s part of a bigger picture like a project where the wiki and blog could be in a community

To: SUB TEAM
From: TEAM LEADER
A new advanced editing feature will be rolled-out on 25-12-07
Please test this and report back.

* This could perhaps be posted on the wiki task blog
- or if it’s part of a bigger picture like a project where the wiki and blog could be in a community

To:3 TEAM MEMBERS
From:1 TEAM MEMBER

The server has been set up and the program installed, you can now proceed.
I had issues with the subscription module, so it’s not installed yet

* This could perhaps be posted on the wiki task blog
- or if it’s part of a bigger picture like a project where the wiki and blog could be in a community
- only members of this community will be subscribed saving other team members not having to be spammed
- so in fact this example is more a project communication, rather than a team communication
- I think it’s important that quick short-lived communities are set up to achieve tasks

To:1 TEAM MEMBER
From: TEAM LEADER
Can you please do this task, and report back and then contact Bill do take it onwards.

* This could perhaps be posted on the wiki task blog
- or if it’s part of a bigger picture like a project where the wiki and blog could be in a community
- just have to put up with other subscribers of the blog getting this post that is only intended for one person

To:1 TEAM MEMBER
From: TEAM LEADER
Can you please update the appendix on this report

* This could perhaps be posted on the wiki task blog
- or if it’s part of a bigger picture like a project where the wiki and blog could be in a community
- just have to put up with other subscribers of the blog getting this post that is only intended for one person

I’m finding with a lot of these tasks a more focused tool like Activities from Lotus Connections would be more appropriate.
Or a commuity or wiki that has social networking so you can message a member in the inbox of that wiki task, rather than your email inbox.
This way the task request is not separate from the task itself, you would only get a notification in your email inbox or perhaps a dashboard to alert you of your task.
It’s also bringing to mind Foldera…but then again there are heaps of task, workflow type tools.

The ultimate scenario is for a team to have a community site that includes:
- sub-communities
- social networking
- blogs
- forums
- wikis
- IM
- tasks

All your work and communications are together. The idea is not to have stuff in your email related to where the work lives, it should all be open and together…no siloes and no people out of the loop.

May 8, 2008

Google Reader Notes

Filed under: blogs, rss, readers

A while back I mentioned that Google Reader Shared Items (which is like a clip blog) needs to be merged with a service like Google Shared Stuff (which is like a clip blog).

The problem I was having is that I could not clip stuff I found outside Google Reader into my Shared Items stream, this meant I had to have two clip streams.

Well now this has been solved with Google Reader Notes.

In the Google Reader console there is now a page called “Your Stuff”, and under this there are two pages called “Shared Items”, and “Notes”.
Clicking on the “Your Stuff” link is a way to see “Shared Items”, and “Notes” in the one stream.

Share with Note

For any item in Google Reader there is an addition to the one-click “Share”, now there is another choice to “Share with Note”
- this pops-up a box where you can add a note/annotation (just like with my Facebook Posted Items).

Notes

“Notes” allows you to make a note without it having to be about a webpage, it’s just like blogging an item.

This can be done via going to the “Notes” page in Google Reader

This automatically shares the item into the “Shared Items” stream, as well as being in your “Notes” stream (which is private).
You can unshare a Note so it no longer appears in your “Shared Items” stream, and is only in your “Notes” stream.

“Note in Reader” bookmarklet

The “Note in Reader” bookmarklet allows you to add an item (along with a note if you like) into your private “Notes” stream.
The bookmarklet also has a box to check to include it in your “Shared Items” stream, before you press submit…otherwise you can decide to share it later on from your “Notes” stream.

Issues

- I wish a Note didn’t share by default
- I’d like to filter the Notes stream by Notes I have shared, and Notes I haven’t shared…this way I can keep some private notes in one spot.
- I can’t edit or delete a Note
- There isn’t a bookmarklet to create a new note (you can only do this from within Google Reader).

What could be next?

- Comments
- Tag “Shared Items”
- A calendar archive
- Template/sidebar additions
- Reblog and item from someone’s “Shared Items” to yours (like Tumblr)
- Merge your “Shared Items” with your friends (like a Tumblr group), or perhaps this could be a network instead like Friendfeed (this is more probable as there already is a “Friends Shared Items” feature.

Google Reader seems to be where I live, so instead of having another window for Webnote, I just like a tab in Google Reader…I wonder if there is a hack.

You’d think they may do this with there own set of products, at the moment at the top of Google Reader I have links to Gmail, Calendar, Docs, etc…what about tabs instead…maybe I’d use Google Notebook, rather then Webnote.

Actually this is what you can do with OtherEgo, but this is more of a profile aggregator by tabs (not quite a lifestream). Not sure if you can add a tab from a private service like Google Reader.

But I like this idea of a private startpage, but instead of widgets on the one page, it’s the whole page by tab.

In one window I could have access to:
Google Reader
Gmail
Twitter
Friendfeed
Facebook
Webnote
del.icio.us
My blog
…and several other pages.

May 7, 2008

Enterprise blog channels for communications

Filed under: blogs, km, communication

This post is an idea, thinking out loud, something to build upon, or perhaps something that is a bad idea…see what you think.

This is a follow-up to my post, Re-purposing email meme, which explained the email problem (overload, siloed) and how a “re-purposing email” idea with social tools can help reduce the anxiety and act as a catalyst for an open, collaborative, conversational and emergent social enterprise.

One thing to note is that you don’t save or waste time, you spend the same amount of time, only spread across various tools…what you are doing is spending your time more wisely (social productivity).

The focus of a future post will be examples of emails, and in what way they can be re-purposed.

But for now I want to examine exactly how blog communication is going to replace email, except emails for private or sensitive one-to-one correspondence.

This post is only about one type of blog use, and that is “communications“.
This is an In-the-Flow usage scenario as the concept is to use blogs instead of email for something we are already doing…this is not an extra thing we have to do, it’s substituting a tool.

This post does not include Above-the-Flow blog (sharing tacit knowledge) uses like:

- Personal/Group blogs (experiences, “thoughts out loud”, ideas, reviews, opinions, “work in progress”)
- Tips and Tricks blog
- Topic blogs
- etc…

If blogs are to replace team and cross-team communication I’ve realised blog channels are required.
Reason being is that when you email a communication, it may be to a:
- team email group
- sub-team email group
- directed at only two sub-team email groups
- directed at 3 out of 10 people in a sub-team
- directed to a team in another business unit
- directed to just two teams in another business unit
- directed to the whole office

I call these mesh blogs, as most blogs above are dedicated to 2 or more email groups.
This makes a blog two way in the sense that it can be a channel for 2 email goups to communicate through.
eg. In email you would have a manager emailing a “communication” to sub-team group
To: DM Support group
From: A DM Management member

Or a sub-team group member emailing a “communication” to the manager group
To: DM Management group
From: A DM support member

Now both these groups can “communicate” or broadcast announcements to each other through a mesh blog called “DM Management-Support blog”.

Both these email or Active Directory groups are auto-subscribed to the blog.
People from other sub-teams are welcome to manually subscribe to the blog.
People from other business units (permissions based) may also be welcome to visit the blog page or subscribe to the blog.

This is openess at it’s best, with visible and centralised content (corporate memory), where conversations (comments) are seen by all…content can evolve.

Other business units may want to point to a blog post in the “DM Management-Support blog” in one of their own blogs as a way to inform their own team…this is the beginnings of an open internal blogosphere.

NOTE: DM is Document Management - this is an example of a team or business unit

Issues

Now what about if the DM Management group wanted to communicate an annoucement to both the DM Support and DM Sys Admin, but not the other sub-teams within this business unit.

Would they cross post in the “DM Management-Support blog”, and the “DM Management-Sys Admin blog”?
Not sure about duplicate posts, as conversations will be fragmented.

If there are often communications directed at both these sub-teams communications, then maybe another blog is required, such as a “DM Management-Support-Sys Admin blog”

If the communication is directed to the whole team then it could be posted in the “DM All Team blog”

The reason I came up with the concept of a “mesh blog”, that is conceived to only serve 2 parties, is to overcome the subscriber issue and occupational spam.

Sometimes communications are not directed at your whole team, and if your whole team is subscribed to your blog, they will get new posts not directly concerning them.
This can be avoided using email as you can push the communication to just one group of people.
But at the same time it’s not an email silo, it’s visible for others to see or even subscribe to.

For an Above-the-Flow blog like a “Tips and Tricks” blog, a non-mesh approach is OK, you publish stuff and people with an interest in your stuff will subscribe.

This is where I get stuck, what if your communication is to your “All team blog”, and also to 2 other business units.

Well maybe this type of communcation could be posted on your “All team External blog”, where your whole team is subscribed and the leads of other business units. Then these business unit leads can point to this blog post in their own teams blog.

But again if there are 10 business unit leads, this post will be spam to 8 business unit leads.
At the same time, it is good for “leads” to be aware of what’s happening around the enterprise.

I guess this is the problem in enterprises at the moment, in that email is a closed system, where people in other business units are not in the loop…I’ve posted on this in the past.
With mesh blogs, even if they are not auto-subscribed, the communication is still visible to visit at the blog page, and they could choose to manually subscribe themselves.

So what was once an email to an email group, is now a blog dedicated to communications between these 2 groups, where blog posts to those same people in the email group (as they are auto-subscribed) are being delivered, and a clean conversation can happen in the comments.

The added value is that what was once a closed email communication, can now be subscribed to by others by their own choice, or they can visit the blog page.

I like that the existence of these pre-made channel like blogs welcome communications within sub-teams and across business units.
Email groups are there for you to post to a whole group if you want to, but having a blog channel as a place dedicated to 2 groups to communicate kind of welcomes or expects communication.

Cross-team awareness is the foundations of a competitive edge that creates conditions for inter-disciplinary conversations, which is a way to innovation…see more.

Tasks

Another issue I had was with emails that contain a task, whether it’s emailed to 1 person or 4 people.

In this case perhaps a wikipage can contain the task, and the wikipage comments can inform of progress and discussion. The wikipage can also have a subscriptions feature for all to be in the loop on the latest version without having to email each other.

Another option is a task specific tool like Activities from Lotus Connections.

In this case of tasks, perhaps email can be used to invite people to the wiki…in this instance blogs are not a suitable tool for this use case.

If a task is part of a bigger task or a project within a team, perhaps a taskforce (community of practice) can be used where members of this community can communicate and collaborate using wikis, blogs, and forums.

NOTE: I’m not referring to client projects, I’m refering to projects/tasks within a team

Team relationships

As I’ve explained above, in relation to “communications” (not Tips and Tricks blogs and the like), I have found each sub-team needs a blog for themselves and separate blogs to deliver communications to each other sub-team, I’ve called these “mesh blogs”.
They are almost an email/blog hybrid in a sense, or perhaps an open email channel.

To really blur the line, there could also be the availability to receive new posts in an email, publish new posts by email, and post comments by email.

If the team (business unit) is small eg. 10 people in an organisation of 100 people, well then perhaps there would not be much occupational spam (I suppose it also depends on the frequency of posts). In this case maybe mesh blogs would not be required, each sub-team could have a blog, and each sub-team could subscribe to each others blogs.
As a support person I wouldn’t be thrilled about getting 3 posts a day from the development blog about stuff I have no clue about, just in the case that they have a once in a while post that I need to know.
But then as a support person I wouldn’t need to subscribe to the development blog, as when they have something to say to the support team, they can post it on the All team blog.
If I like I can visit the development blog to be in the know about stuff that would have usually been closed in email.

Another thing to consider is instead of all these mesh blogs, they could be reduced to categories on a few blogs, and the correct sub-team subscribes to the correct category feeds.

This post is about enterprise business unit or teams, but the same concept could also be applied to bigger sized communities of practice and projects.

Before we start we need to know the relationship between the sub-teams, and from this we can create our list of blogs…here’s a team and it’s sub-teams.

DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT (TEAM or UNIT)
SUB-TEAMS
Executive
Management
Development
Sys Admin
Support

On top of the blogs below, each sub-team could have blogs to cross unit teams or sub-teams
eg. DM sys admin -IT sys admin blog
This is a channel for 2 cross unit sub-teams to communicate.

Another consideration is blogs could further be divided by location, or by function
eg.
DM Support team Perth blog
Server status blog
New release blog
etc…

Here are a list of the blogs for a business unit or team such as Document Management

1. DM All team blog
2. DM All team External (to rest of the organisation) blog

3. DM Management team Internal blog
4. DM Development team Internal blog
5. DM Support team Internal blog
6. DM Sys Admin team Internal blog
7. DM Executive team Internal blog

8. DM Management-Sys Admin team blog
9. DM Management-Support team blog
10. DM Management-Executive team blog
11. DM Management-Development team blog
12. DM Executive-Development team blog
13. DM Development-Sys Admin team blog
14. DM Support-Sys Admin team blog

These really look like proper channels for open communication.

Subscriptions

Any team member can subscribe to any blog.

But most subscriptions are already done at the group level via auto-subscribing groups (or individuals)
- a typical example is members of the DM Support team and the DM Sys Admin team are automatically subscribed to the “DM Support-Sys Admin team blog”

Exceptions

DM DEVELOPMENT TEAM
This team doesn’t really speak to the DM Support team
- they can go through the DM Sys Admin team which have a closer relationship with the DM Support Team
- ie. they can publish a post to the “DM Development-Sys Admin team blog”

DM SUPPORT TEAM
This team doesn’t really speak to the DM Executive team
- they can go through the DM Management team which have a closer relationship with the DM Executive Team
- ie. they can publish a post to the “DM Support-Management team blog”

This team doesn’t really speak to the DM Development team
- they can go through the DM Sys Admin team or the DM Management team which have a closer relationship with the Development Team
- ie. they can publish a post to the “DM Support-Sys Admin team blog” or the “DM Management-Support team blog”

DM SYS ADMIN TEAM
This team doesn’t really speak to the DM Executive team
- they can go through the DM Management team which have a closer relationship with the DM Executive Team
- ie. they can publish a post to the “DM Management-Sys Admin team blog”

DM EXECUTIVE TEAM
This team doesn’t really speak to the DM Support team
- they can go through DM Management team which have a closer relationship with the DM Support Team
- ie. they can publish a post to the “DM Management-Executive team blog”

This team doesn’t really speak to the DM Sys Admin team
- they can go through DM Management team which have a closer relationship with the DM Sys Admin Team
- ie. they can publish a post to the “DM Management-Executive team blog”

Conclusion

This post sounds like a lot of setting up (would it get confusing in a large organisation), perhaps it would be easier for all teams and sub-teams to have non-mesh blogs…that is, regular blogs that people can subscribe to be in the loop. The problem here is since regular blogs are not targeted directly to a group of people, you may have to get 30 unrelated emailed for every related email.

My idea was to leverage what we do with email, but augment it by meshing 2 email groups together with their own unique communication space…which is also visible for others to see or even subscribe to.

As I mentioned mesh blogs are probably not needed in small organisations, as long as the level of posts that are not directly related to you don’t outweigh the posts that are relevant (noise to signal ratio).
To re-iterate perhaps as a member of one sub-team, you wouldn’t need to subscribe to another sub-teams blog, because when that sub-team wants to communication something to your sub-team, they would use the All team blog.
Posting on the All team blog means the other sub-teams will also see this post, but I think this is negligible.

Or as I also mentioned perhaps blog by function would be better, only problem is what if a blog doesn’t exist for the type of communication you want to deliver, whereas mesh blogs are generic.

What do people think about the mesh blog idea, please leave a comment.

April 29, 2008

Grazr does feed filtering and feed blogs

Filed under: blogs, rss, newsmaster, readers, opml

Grazr is a place where you can splice/merge feeds into one stream, or even keep a whole bunch of feeds together and read them by source, which ever way, it’s basically a mini-RSS Reader widget. You can make as many of these as you like and they host it all.

If you merge feeds into the one stream, others can subscribe to this RSS feed.
If you have a bunch of feeds by source, others can subscribe to this OPML feed.

NOTE: Feeds are Grazr’s main deal, but you can also add other type of nodes other than feeds, like an OPML, plain text, links…

Now they have gone a step further and enable you to filter a Grazr by keyword (title, author, body), by date, and by media type. This isn’t filtering each feed you put into a Grazr, it’s filtering the overall Grazr.

All your Grazr’s are hosted in the “Files” tab, here you can re-work your files, etc…
But they are also hosted in a blog view, so each Grazr you make becomes a blog post.

Here’s my Grazr blog, how cool is that.

Each of my Grazr’s is a blog post, and you can subscribe to the feed or OPML of each post.
My Grazr blog also has an overall OPML and RSS feed…hmmm, I could put my Grazr blog feed into FriendFeed.

From what I see the “file” and “blog” views are the same content in different views, it would probably be better if you had the option to choose which files to go into your blog view.

Imagine this for Flickr, etc…sure you have all your Flickr photos in a stream, but this is like your back-end. Imagine each time you add a Flickr photo, you had the option to add it to your Flickr blog, that way your Flickr blog showcases your best stuff. People would rather subscribe to your quality Flickr blog, instead of your main stream…plus a blog is a place to hangout.

April 23, 2008

Blogs can solve cross-departmental communication silos

Filed under: blogs, rss, km, email, communication

When a department has a change they think will affect the organisation as a whole they will send a broadcast email to the whole office.

In a past post I mentioned to perhaps also enter the email address of a blog, so the email can also be published in a blog (post to blog via email).

This way in the future we can consult the blog to remember what’s happened in the past (even derive a bit of analysis and patterns) rather than search through our emails, plus comments enable a two way interaction (valuable insight from the social captial).

Unless the whole office is subscribed to the blog, this still needs to be a broadcast email.

But what about changes that will not affect the whole enterprise, a department has to stop and think, who is going to need to know about these changes we are making.
What they do is find the relevant email groups and send the email announcement.

But have they reached everyone who needs to know…who knows?

Another scenario is a department makes some changes where they can’t forsee it affecting others, so they just communicate the announcement within their own team.

Or maybe they announce their changes to a few people in another department, but those people fail to pass the message on within their own team.

As we can see, there is too much cognitive stress in figuring out who your audience is, there is too much relying on others to let others know.

Scenario

I was on a Document Management Support call and I couldn’t work out why something was behaving different than usual.

My last resort was to ask the IT Support team to troubleshoot the problem.

After explaining the problem, IT told me they changed something in the system and that’s why I was having these issues. It seems they couldn’t forsee how their changes to the system affected my knowledge capability of supporting users.
The problem was easily resolved as I was verbally communicated the remedy.

The problem here is that it was reactionary, I had to have an issue and demand the solution, plus it was embarrasing as they use could clearly see that our departments aren’t communicating properly.

To conclude I was not privy to knowing about this change (nothing to do with privacy, moreso not being on the emai list), and I should have been as it affected my capacity to work, and ultimately wasted company time.

This is typical departmental communication silos, and it’s happening a milion times now in every organisation as I publish this post.

Solution is visibility

The remedy is so easy…we need more visibility, rather than using email and email lists.

Visibility is exactly what I posted about the other day. It’s no a big social enterprise 2.0 effort, it just has to be visible.

In this example if the IT department published this change in a blog announcement, they don’t have to forsee which people this change will affect, as the blog is visible and public for all to see.

As mentioned before thay could still email a list, but also email the blog email address, that way, others not on the email list, can wander over to the blog homepage and see what’s new, or they could even subscribe to the blog.

By just adding the blog email address to that communication we solve the problems in the scenario described above. All it takes is putting one more email address in your email, and you don’t have to worry about lacking to communicate to all the concerned parties.
In turn we have less confusion and embarrasment, and have not wasted time and money.

Visibility is the key.

Decisions, process and actions in one department will affect another, and it’s hard to speculate all parties that will be affected, so why not make this communication public, and others can tune in.

As I mentioned in my K-flow post:

Pull = RSS subscription
Push = email broadcast

We are pushing to who we think should know; we are certain they will get the message as we are pushing it into their inbox, and we can even get a receipt they have read the email.

We are also pushing the message to publish to a blog, without having to go to the blog.

People can visit or pull (subscribe) the new content from this blog
- now people we didn’t think of who should know may be informed

Conclusion

Without any extra effort other than including the blog email address:

- we are not changing the way we work
- we feel secure in knowing we have pushed the message to who should know
- we can also feel comfort in knowing that the public (visitors and blog subscribers) will know what’s going on
- we can visit the blog to see the history of announcement (rather than searching our email)
- people can leave comments for feedback, discussion, etc…

If we had an enterprise blog culture and I was confronted with the scenario above:

A. I would already know the answer as I subscribe to the right blogs

If I didn’t subscribe, I would visit…
B. my teams blog
C. the IT Changes blog

All this without me having to even talk with anyone, and without IT having to know that I should know.

Visibility is the key to communications.

April 17, 2008

Support team knowledge : blog and wiki?

Filed under: blogs, wiki, km

Here’s a summary or clarification of my last couple of posts on Above-the-Flow and In-the-Flow.

A blog can be used for all types of posts like news, announcements, status, etc…this post focuses on using a blog for support know-how.

Blogging a unique solution I have on a support call is In-the-Flow, because it is directed, it’s part of my job duty. If an error is resolved all support staff should know about it.
I’ve started blogging this stuff (seeding), and once I introduce the rest of the team to the blog, hopefully they will do the same.

Support staff are directed to use the support database (where users log calls and we manage our calls) so why not the support or solution blog.

I may use the Support database to record this call and solution, but this database isn’t as free-form as a blog or wiki.

So what I have begun to do is complement this by writing a blog post which is more: human like, it’s personal, it contains the nuances, it may compare to other situations, include extra explanation and workings out of how I got to the solution.

The more context the better, and in some occurrences this extra explanation, rather than the solution, may help you on a similar call.

Whereas the support database asks to fill in some fields, and give the solution, it doesn’t want to know anything else, it’s very formal and to the point, no colour or personality about it…see more.

Another reason to complement support solutions with a blog post is there is no way to subscribe to closed calls, and why would you…if the calls are not unique, I don’t want to be informed of every menial closed call.

Yet another reason is browsing and searching the support database is yuch…at the least.

So why do we use it?

Well it’s good at reporting, we can generate great statistics, people can log calls, we can change the status on a call, pass a call to someone else, etc…you can see that a support database is neccessary.

But I don’t think it’s a good solution database that just contains the gems.

Perhaps a unique solution that is entered into the database can also have the option of being sent as a new blog post.
But then they are not interoparable, and the database doesn’t have rich text and manual categories, etc…

Plus as mentioned earlier the solution entry is not as expansive or intimate as a blog post, it’s more direct to the point…I guess a blog post is more contextual.

What about experiences?

If I have a unique experience about our software or a user or another department, this doesn’t qualify as an entry in the Support database.

This is another reason to use a blog, but this is more an Above-the-Flow scenario, this is a harder thing to get people to do, as it’s not definite like a solution, it’s more soft. It’s a pity because when you read about experiences it sticks with you, you absorb it, when you encounter a similar situation you can be familiar with what to do, or not to do.

Sharing these experiences are vaulable, and a blog can enable this.

At the moment

If I have an experience that everyone should know about or have just closed a support call with a unique solution…no one really knows this has happened.

Why do I want to document and disseminate this information?

…perhaps for my own benefit, so I don’t forget what I know.

Some of us like to share, especially if it’s a solution, we want everyone to know, not really an ego thing, rather a friendly thing to do.
So we usually shoot off an email, we certainly don’t put our solution in a word document and upload it into the DMS.

As I mentioned a group blog is hopefully going to become the new substitute.

I see people will use the blog for solutions to common errors, etc…(In-the-Flow/Directed) but may perhaps use it less for experiences, workarounds, or “did you know if…” (Above-the-Flow/Volunteered).

As mentioned in earlier posts if a volunteered blog post helps someone with their job, then hopefully they will return the benefit and volunteer their own experiences. In addition to this, comments get conversations going that could spur people to want to express themselves more and write an actual blog post.

Blog as database

The blog is going to be the solution database and more…you can browse by date, category, search, use the sidebars for useful stuff, and even subscribe.

Why subscription is powerful?

If I get an an alert update from a new blog post that describes a solution, I now know that this solution exists…I’ve been educated/informed, just like reading daily news.

If I were to later on come across a situation that requires this solution, I can search the blog database knowing that an answer exists. I’m not blind searching hoping there is something documented, as it has come across my eyes before.

This really taps into Dave Snowden’s principle: “People don’t share knowledge in the anticipation that you need it”
- if you ask people to put tacit knowledge in a common data store for a possible need in the future, on the basis you might need it…it just doesn’t happen.

Somehow blogs overcome this has they are dead simple to contribute and they are conversational, they are a place to hang out…it’s more about participating.
This type of framework or ecosystem is all about flow, just check out Ray Sim’s latest slidedeck:

“Slide 20 Stocks
- codifying, capturing, harvesting, storing (STATIC)

Slide 20 Flows
- conversations, fragments, connections (FLUID AND DYNAMIC)

Slide 22 - Why Flows?
- Speed of change versus speed of codifying
- Continuous versus something that happens at the end of the project
- Small pieces loosely joined, context preserving
- Broader participation, with more connections
- Weak signals perception
- Results: innovation and better decision-making”

Another good thing about subscription is if I want to add an entry to the Support blog, I’m not going to publish something that’s already there, I’m not going to create a duplicate entry as I already know that entry has been made as I subscribe to updates.

Our Support database reporting captures all calls, even if the nature of the call has been logged a 100 times, this way we can make decisions on more training for staff or users, or fix bugs and features, etc…
The tag cloud of the support blog can also display patterns that emerge, but of a different nature.

How do wikis fit in?

I’ve decided the group support blog will be for solutions, experiences, tips and tricks, workarounds, did you knows, etc…

The forums will be to ask questions and discuss matters.

Now I am piloting wikis, so how will this fit into the equation?

Maybe the wiki can be a contents page for the gems in the blog support database, kind of like a gateway page.

Or perhaps the wiki can be the solution database itself, just like the blog, each wikipage being a solution.

I kind of like this solution as pages can be re-edited (I suppose a blog post can as well), and you can also have comments (well not in our wiki, but generally).

Hmmm…I do like that you can subscribe to a blog…and a blog is about currency.

Subscribing to a wiki may be painful, especially if lots of changes are made…I have limited experience in subscribing to a wiki.

Perhaps we can use both:

- the wiki can be for solutions
- the blog can be for experiences, insights, announcements…

This means that solutions will not be published as a blog post, but rather in a wikipage.
Instead the blog can be used to publish quick news to notify support staff of a new solution in the wiki.

Maybe this is the way to go.

I also want to make an error image gallery wiki, clicking on an image will take you to the solution which lives on another wikipage.

Another question is how open are both the wiki and the blog?

I’d have them both open with modify access for the whole support team…gardening can be done later, rather than getting through a gatekeeper upfront. They both need to be open to capture things as they happen, and for everyone to feel they equally own the knowledge base.

What do you think, can anyone shed any light on this scenario?

Tap into the social capital

There’s a few related memes at the moment on learning and familiarising yourself in a new environment or situation, this also applies to methods used in find things and getting things done in your current environment.

Not talking just explicit stuff, but tacit stuff like:

- “didn’t you know, when that happens, you gotta use this workaround”

- “goto Jill, I know she is in IT, but she knows more than anyone about travel medicine”

- “that sort of informal information is stored on this spreadsheet kept in this share drive in this folder, it would be good if we could have it on the Intranet”

Examples

  • A new employee getting to know the place, the right people and information to get their job done
  • - Stewart Mader - using wikis
    - Dave Snowden - finding stories via a social networking quest
    - Shawn Callahan - social learning

  • Working with a new team
  • Mergers and Acquisitions
  • - Dennis McDonald - blogs and social networks
    - Thomas Vander Wal- social bookmarks, blogs and wikis

  • Finding the right person, and the right information
  • - Gia Lyons - expert locator, blogs, bookmarks, social networks (Lotus Connections)

This post shows the great value in tapping into the social capital to find the right person and information.
It describes two forms of social behaviour: Lurk-n-Learn, and Connect-n-Collaborate.
Check out the examples in how you get things done, how you find stuff, discover, collaborate, etc…

There are a few screencasts on Lotus Connections, this one I think exemplifies the great power of finding the right people and information based on a participation culture in a social ecosystem…also check out Lotus Greenhouse.

More from Gia:

“You can also include Atlas for Lotus Connections, an add-on asset not included in the license, that does the following:

Visualize and analyze social networks in an organization
Identify the shortest social path to reach someone
Find expertise across extended networks
Visualize and manage personal networks”

Social tools empower the individual to discover and make sense of all the people in our company, without them, each person is losing opportunity in finding a person or their content in helping them get things done. We’ve all heard of re-inventing the wheel syndrome, or, after the fact (”didn’t you know so and so, are an expert who could of helped you”).

Lotus Connections is more than a directory, every person has a profile page, on that page you can read about:

- who they are
- who they report to
- project they have worked on
- communities they are in
- keywords they have tagged themselves with (expert tags)
- keywords others have tagged them with (expert tags)
- latest blog posts, bookmarks
- contact details

Scenario

You are after an expert in the new technologies in “nuclear reactor design” who know’s the Russian language:

- look up the keyword tag “nuclear” in the expert locator (profiles)
- you find 7 people, and 2 communities about the topic “nuclear”
(it also displays related tags like “decomissioning”, “uranium”)
- you look into each of these 7 profiles and notice 1 of them speak Russian
- you look at their bookmarks (web-pages they have saved, probably when they were researching stuff)
- you look at their blog and see that their latest posts are about new technologies on this topic
(this person is not only an expert, but is up-to-date on the latest methods)
- while you are there you can visit the 2 communities to see discussions, blogs, forums, documents, etc…
(perhaps you may find useful information and people in these communities)

All this without having to be linked by hierarchy or a team, or limited to just the people you know or your office location, or having to broadcast an email…accidental collision some say.

Now every person in the enterprise can find people they need to get things done by leveraging the social capital, this is sure to get the best person for the job, cut down your cycle time, and save you money…no more lost opportunities just because we couldn’t “see through” our organisation.

Not only is Profiles an expert locator, but it connects to the other social components of Lotus Connections, we can find out more about a person: websites they save (bookmarks), what they are up to (blog), communities they are enagaging with, etc…

I guess you can say that profile pages lead to social networks (something Lotus Connections will absorb with its Beehive product), which is how the millennial generation get things done (they really don’t use email, they find it too static).

For a more business perspective check out this presentation, The Business Value Of IBM Social Software.
Contrast this social way of getting things done compared to an Intranet, email and a Document Management System, which environment would you choose ;)

April 16, 2008

Knowledge visibility, conversation, and the In and Out Flow

Filed under: blogs, wiki, km, conversation

This post is a continuation from the thought on the two types of macro ways social tools can be used in the enterprise. My other posts are Collaboration, Emergence and Culture, and Free-form structure and In-the-Flow process can lead to more.

Using social tools is making contributions more: transparent, centralised, visible, smoother collaboration, inventive, re-usable, offers inbox relief, and the obvious…emergence.

In-the-Flow refers to “Directed” contribution

eg. wiki for a meeting agenda/minutes, blog or announcements or news.
Anything you do that is part of your functional duties.
You are sometimes substituting these social tools over traditional tools like email.

As mentioned in an earlier post by the Transparent Office, you don’t need a collaborative culture to adopt In-the-Flow contributions, as you are not doing anything extra, you are still getting your task done, but just using a new tool or two.
It concluded that when it comes to “collaboration” (not to be confused with emergence), culture is a destination, not a starting point.

This is not “knowledge sharing”, it’s just using the right tool for the job, see more.

And it’s not just “collaboration” eg. using a blog for project announcements rather than email is not collaboration…it’s a directed In-the-Flow use of social tools.

What it is…is more “knowledge visible”; others can come across this information as it’s more open and not siloed.

This is not extracting anymore tacit know-how than before when email was the main tool to get things done…but indeed it may be, as visibility provides exposure of content to more people, rather than just the people in the email to: field. In turn someone may decide to contribute some insight.

People from all over the enterprise (permissions considered) can come across these social objects, and can read what’s happening (like reading the news), or even leave a comment.
This visibility has created the opportunity for someone to actually volunteer some shared insight…this is “knowledge sharing”, or it could be “learning” if the nature of the comment is a clarification or question. A subsequent clarification by the originator could be “sharing know-how”, and this exchange may evolve into new content.

All this demonstrates that “conversation” is where all the gold lives, actually where all the gold is made.
Here’s a quote to remember from Jon Husband (very Snowdenesque):

“how to create a knowledge sharing culture?,” is not the right question. It’s more important to ask and understand “what you can do to encourage and facilitate connections?”

Above-the-Flow refers to “Volunteered” contribution

eg. a wiki glossary, blogging ideas, experiences, work in progress, insights, opinions, reviews, thinking out loud.
Any sharing that is not really contributing to your functional duties…ie without doing it you can still do your job.

Sure it may help (social productivity) with you and your teams functional duties by having a wikipage that lists links to pages you regularly visit, but this isn’t essential to get your task done. This is in the realm of personal knowledge management (PKM), but extending PKM in a more visible and social way.

This is closer to the concept of “knowledge sharing” as it’s volunteered, you are taking time away from your job, to contribute your know-how in general.

But sometimes it’s very closely related to your job, you may contribute some of your personal know-how in a blog for personal reasons; so you don’t forget what you know…like keeping notes.

If this content is visible, others can benefit from your personal notes, and in turn you can benefit from an insightful comment, and a visitor can benefit just by reading it…all about leveraging social capital.

Is this type of Above-the-Flow contribution, precisely “knowledge sharing?”…I think it’s just “participation” and “visibility”.

“Knowledge sharing” has a connotation of effort, something extra, whereas “participating” feels more like “being”, it’s just what you do…you learn by participating.

Does public or open equal sharing, or is sharing a more altrustic thing?

I think it’s a bit of both.

When you blog post about an idea, experience, work in progress, this again may be a personal diary, but at the same time you are making it public on purpose, as you welcome any reaction that may reafirm, evolve, clarify your content…I do think this is “knowledge sharing”, but perhaps “participating” is a better description.

More pure sharing is when you publish a review, opinion, latest rumour/news/links…this again becomes an entry in your personal database (blog) for future reference, but the purpose of publishing is more to inform others and to provoke reaction and discussion.

An even more pure form is when you find something that is of no interest to you, and send it to someone else…this type of thing still happens in email.
Sure people can tune into my social bookmarks, but I may not want to bookmark something that I know about, but still want to pass it on to you.
I’m certainly not going to blog about it, because the blog is about me, so I could send it to your public wall profile so others may see it as well, but perhaps even better I could send it to your social bookmarks inbox, as this inbox is the right context for web links.

In-the-Flow to In-the-Flow
Due to visibility, a visitor can come across a piece of In-the-Flow contributed content to perhaps use as their own In-the-Flow contribution. What you have found out elsewhere may help you with your task. You may post to your team about a lead, an innovation, a way to cut costs that came to your attention.

In-the-Flow to Above-the-Flow
An In-the-Flow contribution may lead to an Above-the-Flow contribution, like leaving a comment or a volunteered blog post (even though it’s not their task, they are just being social and helpful).

This model is dynamic, as long as content is visible, it allows conversation to happen at any moment…people are participating in public rather than in closed email sets.

Above-the-Flow to Above-the-Flow
I could volunteer a blog post about a client in the news, and someone else could volunteer a comment or publish their own blog post, there could be great discussion…this is all Above-the-Flow.

Above-the-Flow to In-the-Flow
If I blog about my current reflections (understanding/what I’m learning) about a work in progress, I may get feedback that helps me get my task or deliverable done better, perhaps less time and cost…not to mention I have been educated…and why, all because I participate.
Or I could come across a volunteered blog post about a client, and that Above-the-Flow contribution could be just the information I need to complete my job, so I blog post an announcement to my team (In-the-Flow).

Driver

As mentioned at the start of this post, In-the-Flow adoption is easier, what is harder is the Above-the-Flow volunteered contributions, as these are not neccessary to get your job done.
But still if you experience such an ecosystem, you will see that it indeed helps you get your job done, more than ever before.
- you can read what others publish for new insight
- if you publish others can help you out

The more you get benefit from reading volunteered contributions the more chance you may want to participate more seriously and start publishing. Plus conversations are infectious, and social creatures like us will take to tools that can be an extension of your voice box.

The main drive is to get those pioneering Above-the-Flow participants, to kick things off, and hopefully all else will follow.
This is not an adoption post, but the main kicker is for champions to just go at it, and serve as a role model, and generate examples of successes, as well as getting senior people involved…a lot is about change management.

The benefit we do have is, In-the-Flow to Above-the-Flow…hopefully it can be seen that the same new tools that we will be using for directed contributions are also handy to express whatever you want, and to have conversations about general work stuff.

The “work in progress” magic

Earlier on I mentioned, “work in progress”, meaning: “what I’m currently up to”, “the current state of things”, “my musings or understanding”, “what I just learnt along the way.”

As you can see “work in progress” is a vague term, and I think in another perspective you could see it also as, In-the-Flow, as it could be a substitute for some meetings, or the progress (status) email you send your boss/colleagues.

The part that is Above-the-Flow is not really about progress per se, but more about what you are exploring, your research thoughts, anything you find interesting (don’t want to have to wait to read the final report), anything interesting about your process, research methods, etc…

“Work in progress” is a great term that may blur the line between In-the-Flow and Above-the-Flow. What it means is that the more In-the-Flow contributions are more (Above-the-Flow) characteristic to casual and intimate know-how, the more chance this will spur volunteered contributions.

So maybe we could stress “work in progress” blogging and using wikis for collaborative constructing documents before they become formal deliverables, as a prime method to get your work done more productively, and also in extracting tacit knowledge…and creating conditions for conversation-leading to emergence, and ultimately innovation.

It’s not just wikis and blogs, in the end of a recent post I mentioned that the micro-blogging format is closer to expressing tacit know-how and conversations, which is what KM has always been about.

This excerpt about “conversation”, from Matthew Hodgson on the