<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knowledge as a way of being, not an accumulation of facts!</title>
	<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2010/04/06/knowledge-as-a-way-of-being-not-an-accumulation-of-facts/</link>
	<description>sharing ideas thoughts and feedback</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John Tropea</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2010/04/06/knowledge-as-a-way-of-being-not-an-accumulation-of-facts/#comment-33586</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:25:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2010/04/06/knowledge-as-a-way-of-being-not-an-accumulation-of-facts/#comment-33586</guid>
					<description>Thx Chris.

Given all this, I like how Harold Jarche puts it:

&quot;…we need to move away from a focus on knowledge transfer and acquisition, an approach rooted in Plato’s academy…we are moving to the world of the sons of Socrates, where dialogue and guidance are key competencies.&quot;

http://johntropea.tumblr.com/post/499768656/we-need-to-move-away-from-a-focus-on-knowledge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thx Chris.</p>
	<p>Given all this, I like how Harold Jarche puts it:</p>
	<p>&#8220;…we need to move away from a focus on knowledge transfer and acquisition, an approach rooted in Plato’s academy…we are moving to the world of the sons of Socrates, where dialogue and guidance are key competencies.&#8221;</p>
	<p><a >http://johntropea.tumblr.com/post/499768656/we-need-to-move-away-from-a-focus-on-knowledge</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris Rodgers</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2010/04/06/knowledge-as-a-way-of-being-not-an-accumulation-of-facts/#comment-33584</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:34:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2010/04/06/knowledge-as-a-way-of-being-not-an-accumulation-of-facts/#comment-33584</guid>
					<description>Agreed, John.  As Arthur says, it's spot on - at least as I see it!

The idea that knowledge can be &quot;captured&quot; is a myth.  It only arises in the moment of interaction (including interaction with oneself!).  It might, as you say, draw on pre-existing data or information that has been written down or otherwise stored in artefacts of various kinds; but it is an active and relational &lt;i&gt;process&lt;/i&gt;, not a 'thing'.

As Weick says, &quot;How do I know what I think until I hear what I say?&quot;  

Make of that what you will!

Cheers,  Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Agreed, John.  As Arthur says, it&#8217;s spot on - at least as I see it!</p>
	<p>The idea that knowledge can be &#8220;captured&#8221; is a myth.  It only arises in the moment of interaction (including interaction with oneself!).  It might, as you say, draw on pre-existing data or information that has been written down or otherwise stored in artefacts of various kinds; but it is an active and relational <i>process</i>, not a &#8216;thing&#8217;.</p>
	<p>As Weick says, &#8220;How do I know what I think until I hear what I say?&#8221;  </p>
	<p>Make of that what you will!</p>
	<p>Cheers,  Chris
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Tropea</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2010/04/06/knowledge-as-a-way-of-being-not-an-accumulation-of-facts/#comment-33565</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:19:12 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2010/04/06/knowledge-as-a-way-of-being-not-an-accumulation-of-facts/#comment-33565</guid>
					<description>Thx for the pithy comment Arthur.

Yes, this is the real KM as we are creating knowledge via our inquiry/conversation. Once applied that becomes knowledge for me, but information for someone else...waiting to be remixed again.

Definitely a change to a work in progress culture

http://michaeli.typepad.com/my_weblog/2008/01/mcafee-on-widen.html

http://www.e-gineer.com/v2/blog/2007/12/building-enterprise-20-on-culture-10.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thx for the pithy comment Arthur.</p>
	<p>Yes, this is the real KM as we are creating knowledge via our inquiry/conversation. Once applied that becomes knowledge for me, but information for someone else&#8230;waiting to be remixed again.</p>
	<p>Definitely a change to a work in progress culture</p>
	<p><a >http://michaeli.typepad.com/my_weblog/2008/01/mcafee-on-widen.html</a></p>
	<p><a >http://www.e-gineer.com/v2/blog/2007/12/building-enterprise-20-on-culture-10.htm</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Arthur Shelley</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2010/04/06/knowledge-as-a-way-of-being-not-an-accumulation-of-facts/#comment-33564</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 22:56:58 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2010/04/06/knowledge-as-a-way-of-being-not-an-accumulation-of-facts/#comment-33564</guid>
					<description>John,
Spot on! The Constructivist approach (loosely and simplified) is that knowledge is created as interactions occur between people. This also builds bonds between those involved which accelerates the flow, creating a positive spiral. In many ways, documents are dead (or at the least in a coma) until brought to life through a conversation. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>John,<br />
Spot on! The Constructivist approach (loosely and simplified) is that knowledge is created as interactions occur between people. This also builds bonds between those involved which accelerates the flow, creating a positive spiral. In many ways, documents are dead (or at the least in a coma) until brought to life through a conversation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

