<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Conversations that revolve around task objects</title>
	<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/</link>
	<description>sharing ideas thoughts and feedback</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Robert Steele</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/#comment-34570</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:41:39 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/#comment-34570</guid>
					<description>AtTask (or as it is listed here &quot;@task&quot;) is my top recommendation on this list. I'm glad to see that it is on the list dated to 2009. Most lists I've seen from 2009 and before are filled with management tools that are no longer in use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>AtTask (or as it is listed here &#8220;@task&#8221;) is my top recommendation on this list. I&#8217;m glad to see that it is on the list dated to 2009. Most lists I&#8217;ve seen from 2009 and before are filled with management tools that are no longer in use.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jordan Frank</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/#comment-32895</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:46:03 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/#comment-32895</guid>
					<description>Thanks to John for posting my note about the two important themes: (1) unifying the data model and (2) communicating across workspace silos. I just wrote a post that expands on both of these issues. Have a look at Enterprise 2.0 and the Importance of Silo Smashing: 

http://traction.tractionsoftware.com/traction/permalink/Blog1049
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks to John for posting my note about the two important themes: (1) unifying the data model and (2) communicating across workspace silos. I just wrote a post that expands on both of these issues. Have a look at Enterprise 2.0 and the Importance of Silo Smashing: </p>
	<p><a >http://traction.tractionsoftware.com/traction/permalink/Blog1049</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Tropea</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/#comment-32887</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 01:39:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/#comment-32887</guid>
					<description>POSTING AN EMAIL JORDAN FRANK (Traction) SENT TO ME:

You are pointing to two VERY important themes. 

-- First is the need to unify a data model so that tasks aren't inherently separate from the communication about them. 

-- The second is the need to communicate across workspace silos. 

Two recent blog posts also nip at the edges of this point:

-- Michael Sampson's Currents: &quot;TeamPage - the One System to Rule It All&quot; -- Michael talks directly about how our permission model uniquely allows for boundary spanning conversation. 

http://traction.tractionsoftware.com/traction/permalink/Press348


-- SharePoint 2007: Gateway Drug to Enterprise Social Tools -- Thomas Vander Wal talks about the &quot;silo&quot; problem in Sharepoint. Which really exists between workspaces, and between components of each workspace.

http://www.personalinfocloud.com/2009/03/sharepoint-2007-gateway-drug-to-enterprise-social-tools.html

Jordan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>POSTING AN EMAIL JORDAN FRANK (Traction) SENT TO ME:</p>
	<p>You are pointing to two VERY important themes. </p>
	<p>&#8212; First is the need to unify a data model so that tasks aren&#8217;t inherently separate from the communication about them. </p>
	<p>&#8212; The second is the need to communicate across workspace silos. </p>
	<p>Two recent blog posts also nip at the edges of this point:</p>
	<p>&#8212; Michael Sampson&#8217;s Currents: &#8220;TeamPage - the One System to Rule It All&#8221; &#8212; Michael talks directly about how our permission model uniquely allows for boundary spanning conversation. </p>
	<p><a >http://traction.tractionsoftware.com/traction/permalink/Press348</a></p>
	<p>&#8212; SharePoint 2007: Gateway Drug to Enterprise Social Tools &#8212; Thomas Vander Wal talks about the &#8220;silo&#8221; problem in Sharepoint. Which really exists between workspaces, and between components of each workspace.</p>
	<p><a >http://www.personalinfocloud.com/2009/03/sharepoint-2007-gateway-drug-to-enterprise-social-tools.html</a></p>
	<p>Jordan
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jon Husband</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/#comment-32883</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:05:21 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/#comment-32883</guid>
					<description>IMO blueKiwi gets at the core of this issue in interesting ways</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>IMO blueKiwi gets at the core of this issue in interesting ways
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Priyanka</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/#comment-32846</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:13:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/#comment-32846</guid>
					<description>You can also add DeskAway (http://www.deskaway.com) to this list. Its a project management &amp;amp; collaboration tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You can also add DeskAway (http://www.deskaway.com) to this list. Its a project management &amp; collaboration tool.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mark Roberts</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/#comment-32840</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/12/conversations-that-revolve-around-task-objects/#comment-32840</guid>
					<description>John, great post.  I'll have to check out the new McKinsey report.

We are working on a new product that we believe encapsulates some of what you are talking about.  Its a very lightweight task management tool that promotes social tasking.  It is similar to actionitem.com, but the newer code is quite an advancement over that.

I'd be interested to get your feedback on what we are doing, and if you have the time, involvement through several of our development cycles.  Be happy to take this offline (out of this thread) if you like.

Regards,
Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>John, great post.  I&#8217;ll have to check out the new McKinsey report.</p>
	<p>We are working on a new product that we believe encapsulates some of what you are talking about.  Its a very lightweight task management tool that promotes social tasking.  It is similar to actionitem.com, but the newer code is quite an advancement over that.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;d be interested to get your feedback on what we are doing, and if you have the time, involvement through several of our development cycles.  Be happy to take this offline (out of this thread) if you like.</p>
	<p>Regards,<br />
Mark
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

