<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter 3 years on, and why it&#8217;s the killer app!</title>
	<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/</link>
	<description>sharing ideas thoughts and feedback</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: John Tropea</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32872</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 07:32:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32872</guid>
					<description>Thx Samuel.

What it comes down to is Twitter deals with readily absorbable small fragments.

I can post anything in the Twitter stream - a question, a link, an answer, a thought, etc...there is a blur between publishing and just regular chat. 

Some people prefer all in one, rather than:
-RSS reader to read
-IM to chat
etc...

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thx Samuel.</p>
	<p>What it comes down to is Twitter deals with readily absorbable small fragments.</p>
	<p>I can post anything in the Twitter stream - a question, a link, an answer, a thought, etc&#8230;there is a blur between publishing and just regular chat. </p>
	<p>Some people prefer all in one, rather than:<br />
-RSS reader to read<br />
-IM to chat<br />
etc&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Samuel</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32867</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32867</guid>
					<description>Great post, John. I like the way you compared the tools! And I agree with the distinctions you make. I think this is very important with all the tools coming at knowledge workers. I see lots of people finding it hard to decide when to use which tool. Of course these tools are on a continuum, they blur, but telling each other which way to use the tool in the best way or for a certain goal is very helpful. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Great post, John. I like the way you compared the tools! And I agree with the distinctions you make. I think this is very important with all the tools coming at knowledge workers. I see lots of people finding it hard to decide when to use which tool. Of course these tools are on a continuum, they blur, but telling each other which way to use the tool in the best way or for a certain goal is very helpful. Thanks!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Tropea</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32828</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 05:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32828</guid>
					<description>Jon,

Seems we are on the same page, as I recently re-posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://johntropea.tumblr.com/post/84008991/i-keep-thinking-its-not-really-about-roi&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;something you said&lt;/a&gt; to that effect.

We can only understand by doing an ROI, as like you say, some don't understand the magnitude. This isn't *something* new, this *is* a new way. 

Social computing may be something new, but enterprise 2.0 is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2008/11/14/are-you-really-doing-enterprise-20/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;holistic picture&lt;/a&gt;.

The term enterprise 2.0 is not a light one, it's basically a new way of running an enterprise (networks blended with hierarchy). And something that may take decades to fully diffuse into the business consciousness (as &lt;a href=&quot;http://johntropea.tumblr.com/post/73874365/here-comes-everybody-clay-shirky-p67-8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clay Shirky describes&lt;/a&gt; past paths of social change)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Jon,</p>
	<p>Seems we are on the same page, as I recently re-posted <a href="http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/go.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fjohntropea.tumblr.com%2Fpost%2F84008991%2Fi-keep-thinking-its-not-really-about-roi&amp;i=0&amp;c=b4d8bcb7c789510678052a6224761b50a25e0510" rel="nofollow">something you said</a> to that effect.</p>
	<p>We can only understand by doing an ROI, as like you say, some don&#8217;t understand the magnitude. This isn&#8217;t *something* new, this *is* a new way. </p>
	<p>Social computing may be something new, but enterprise 2.0 is the <a href="http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/go.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Flibraryclips.blogsome.com%2F2008%2F11%2F14%2Fare-you-really-doing-enterprise-20%2F&amp;i=0&amp;c=d1ebc60d3ab966fd5e718f80c8a052f9c52fa3bf" rel="nofollow">holistic picture</a>.</p>
	<p>The term enterprise 2.0 is not a light one, it&#8217;s basically a new way of running an enterprise (networks blended with hierarchy). And something that may take decades to fully diffuse into the business consciousness (as <a href="http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/go.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fjohntropea.tumblr.com%2Fpost%2F73874365%2Fhere-comes-everybody-clay-shirky-p67-8&amp;i=0&amp;c=764ea7c879802b82cff1eac77b1ca208cac8a6f2" rel="nofollow">Clay Shirky describes</a> past paths of social change)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jon Husband</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32823</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 08:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32823</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;There is something so enigmatic about Twitter, but at the same time &lt;b&gt;it’s closer to how we behave in real life&lt;/b&gt;, so it should seem like a given.&lt;/i&gt;

This is the key ... my emphasis in bold.

All of this Web 2.0 stuff has been basically about replication-with-a-twist of how people communicate and behave in interaction .. re-creating human sociologies with tools and services that approximate real-world communications and interactional dynamics.

The simpler and easier it gets, the more easy it is for people to adopt &amp;amp; adapt.

Most people speak to each other in relatively short snippets (haven't you had the experience of people getting frustrated or bored if it is a long and complex dialogue / conversation ?).

The nice thing about the web (tools &amp;amp; services) is that there are also functions, features, functionality that enables aggregation, filtering, combining, clustering, archiving, easy retrieval .. so the scope and scale of possibilities extends.  Oral conversations &quot;evaporate&quot; unless they are remembered or recorded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>There is something so enigmatic about Twitter, but at the same time <b>it’s closer to how we behave in real life</b>, so it should seem like a given.</i></p>
	<p>This is the key &#8230; my emphasis in bold.</p>
	<p>All of this Web 2.0 stuff has been basically about replication-with-a-twist of how people communicate and behave in interaction .. re-creating human sociologies with tools and services that approximate real-world communications and interactional dynamics.</p>
	<p>The simpler and easier it gets, the more easy it is for people to adopt &amp; adapt.</p>
	<p>Most people speak to each other in relatively short snippets (haven&#8217;t you had the experience of people getting frustrated or bored if it is a long and complex dialogue / conversation ?).</p>
	<p>The nice thing about the web (tools &amp; services) is that there are also functions, features, functionality that enables aggregation, filtering, combining, clustering, archiving, easy retrieval .. so the scope and scale of possibilities extends.  Oral conversations &#8220;evaporate&#8221; unless they are remembered or recorded.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Tropea</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32820</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 22:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32820</guid>
					<description>Thx guys,

It's something I've been wondering about for a while, in that not everyone in the enterprise will need a blog, but everyone may want micro-sharing (or whatever Twitter is).

I can't see one of our admin ladies at work blogging, but I could see her micro-sharing
- no real effort to have an account
- you get to make a contact list
- you can ask questions
- you can converse

There is something so enigmatic about Twitter, but at the same time it's closer to how we behave in real life, so it should seem like a given.

Ohh, I didn't include anything about a business model...oh well, and perhaps the fear of @reply spamming as it becomes more mainstream

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thx guys,</p>
	<p>It&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve been wondering about for a while, in that not everyone in the enterprise will need a blog, but everyone may want micro-sharing (or whatever Twitter is).</p>
	<p>I can&#8217;t see one of our admin ladies at work blogging, but I could see her micro-sharing<br />
- no real effort to have an account<br />
- you get to make a contact list<br />
- you can ask questions<br />
- you can converse</p>
	<p>There is something so enigmatic about Twitter, but at the same time it&#8217;s closer to how we behave in real life, so it should seem like a given.</p>
	<p>Ohh, I didn&#8217;t include anything about a business model&#8230;oh well, and perhaps the fear of @reply spamming as it becomes more mainstream
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jon</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32819</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32819</guid>
					<description>Funny that after what seems like a few years of deep &amp;amp; widespread concern about the underlying business model of so many web-enabled service providers, that Twitter's business model is such a non-issue these days!

Where are the people doubting the value?

Good post John!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Funny that after what seems like a few years of deep &amp; widespread concern about the underlying business model of so many web-enabled service providers, that Twitter&#8217;s business model is such a non-issue these days!</p>
	<p>Where are the people doubting the value?</p>
	<p>Good post John!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jon Husband</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32818</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2009/03/04/twitter-3-years-on-and-why-its-the-killer-app/#comment-32818</guid>
					<description>What an insanely great summary post !  A book 9almost) in one blog post.

Well done, John.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>What an insanely great summary post !  A book 9almost) in one blog post.</p>
	<p>Well done, John.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

