<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crowdvine for conference : social networking and matching</title>
	<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2007/11/26/crowdvine-for-conference-social-networking-and-matching/</link>
	<description>sharing ideas thoughts and feedback</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tony Stubblebine</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2007/11/26/crowdvine-for-conference-social-networking-and-matching/#comment-32308</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 02:16:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2007/11/26/crowdvine-for-conference-social-networking-and-matching/#comment-32308</guid>
					<description>John, thanks for the post. Totally agree about aggregation. For a short lived social network around a conference it doesn't make any sense to lock in the users or data. Plus, as Stuart pointed out, having the content spread out over existing sites extends the reach of the conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>John, thanks for the post. Totally agree about aggregation. For a short lived social network around a conference it doesn&#8217;t make any sense to lock in the users or data. Plus, as Stuart pointed out, having the content spread out over existing sites extends the reach of the conference.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
