<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati: popularity slider and more</title>
	<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/02/17/technorati-popularity-slider-and-more/</link>
	<description>sharing ideas thoughts and feedback</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Philip Small</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/02/17/technorati-popularity-slider-and-more/#comment-21480</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2006 01:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/02/17/technorati-popularity-slider-and-more/#comment-21480</guid>
					<description>&lt;em&gt;he would like to call it Popularity Slider, and so would I.&lt;/em&gt;

Certainly agree.  I consider my &lt;a&gt;blog&lt;/a&gt; an authoritative source within its subject area (soil), an area clogged by popular posts mentioning soil in a popular sense.  (&quot;terrorists on our soil&quot;, &quot;soiled honor&quot;, etc)  I am sure the same could be said for a large group of common terms with technical underpinnings: house, water, car, rock, tree, space, light, phone, weather, ... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><em>he would like to call it Popularity Slider, and so would I.</em></p>
	<p>Certainly agree.  I consider my <a>blog</a> an authoritative source within its subject area (soil), an area clogged by popular posts mentioning soil in a popular sense.  (&#8221;terrorists on our soil&#8221;, &#8220;soiled honor&#8221;, etc)  I am sure the same could be said for a large group of common terms with technical underpinnings: house, water, car, rock, tree, space, light, phone, weather, &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: the weblog repository</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/02/17/technorati-popularity-slider-and-more/#comment-21297</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/02/17/technorati-popularity-slider-and-more/#comment-21297</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;ask a librarian&lt;/strong&gt;

I&amp;#8217;ve just been visiting Blogsome.com, at the recommendation of someone I studied with who has quite a blog on all things RSS and librarysome. John Tropea&amp;#8217;s blog is hosted with this Irish group, for free, with one rather startling proviso - ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>ask a librarian</strong></p>
	<p>I&#8217;ve just been visiting Blogsome.com, at the recommendation of someone I studied with who has quite a blog on all things RSS and librarysome. John Tropea&#8217;s blog is hosted with this Irish group, for free, with one rather startling proviso - &#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Semantic and tagging thoughts</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/02/17/technorati-popularity-slider-and-more/#comment-21296</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 08:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/02/17/technorati-popularity-slider-and-more/#comment-21296</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Filter + popularity /= exploring&lt;/strong&gt;

Technorati also sees the need to find what sources are better than others.  They have an authority slider.  Interesting perspective here.

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Filter + popularity /= exploring</strong></p>
	<p>Technorati also sees the need to find what sources are better than others.  They have an authority slider.  Interesting perspective here.</p>
	<p>&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
