<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.1-alpha" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rojo: functionality and attention data</title>
	<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/01/20/rojo-functionality-and-attention-data/</link>
	<description>sharing ideas thoughts and feedback</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.1-alpha</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: ycc2106</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/01/20/rojo-functionality-and-attention-data/#comment-19129</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 23:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/01/20/rojo-functionality-and-attention-data/#comment-19129</guid>
					<description>I was using bliglines and your post made me want to try Rojo, so I signed in just now.
It's much quicker and fluide!
thanks! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I was using bliglines and your post made me want to try Rojo, so I signed in just now.<br />
It&#8217;s much quicker and fluide!<br />
thanks! <img src='http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Burton</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/01/20/rojo-functionality-and-attention-data/#comment-18643</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/01/20/rojo-functionality-and-attention-data/#comment-18643</guid>
					<description>Most of TailRank's personalization functionality will be landing soon.

We had this integrated before but it didn't reasonate with people so we're trying to make it simpler...

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Most of TailRank&#8217;s personalization functionality will be landing soon.</p>
	<p>We had this integrated before but it didn&#8217;t reasonate with people so we&#8217;re trying to make it simpler&#8230;</p>
	<p>Kevin
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Chris - Touchstone Gadget</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/01/20/rojo-functionality-and-attention-data/#comment-18579</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/01/20/rojo-functionality-and-attention-data/#comment-18579</guid>
					<description>Good arvo John - This is a great article and feature request list for feed readers. You are really immersed in this whole thing and your ideas are awesome!

I also wanted to thank you for bookmarking Touchstone on del.icio.us - Your our first :)

Your feedback and suggestions on our alpha/beta program would be very insightful - if you were ever interested drop me a line and I would be happy to give you access!

Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Good arvo John - This is a great article and feature request list for feed readers. You are really immersed in this whole thing and your ideas are awesome!</p>
	<p>I also wanted to thank you for bookmarking Touchstone on del.icio.us - Your our first <img src='http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/wp-images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
	<p>Your feedback and suggestions on our alpha/beta program would be very insightful - if you were ever interested drop me a line and I would be happy to give you access!</p>
	<p>Keep up the great work!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jack Vinson</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/01/20/rojo-functionality-and-attention-data/#comment-18478</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/01/20/rojo-functionality-and-attention-data/#comment-18478</guid>
					<description>Wowee.  Nice overview, John.  

In the Issues section, you mention the problem with what defines something as read.  If you collapse the item, is it read?  Or are you just getting it out of the way?  And how do you indicate to the system that not only have you read it but that it is interesting enough that it should recommend similar things to you.  (Or the converse: please ignore that piece of drivel from Jack.)

The _idea_ behind tools that provide recommendations based on specific reading habits is interesting, but I always think about these exceptions.  I'd be more interested in recommendations based on my OPML.  

Now, if the tool measured how much time I spent on any given post (relative to its length), that might say something more about the attention and interestingness than whether I've marked it or not....  But then, maybe I am dreaming.

Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wowee.  Nice overview, John.  </p>
	<p>In the Issues section, you mention the problem with what defines something as read.  If you collapse the item, is it read?  Or are you just getting it out of the way?  And how do you indicate to the system that not only have you read it but that it is interesting enough that it should recommend similar things to you.  (Or the converse: please ignore that piece of drivel from Jack.)</p>
	<p>The _idea_ behind tools that provide recommendations based on specific reading habits is interesting, but I always think about these exceptions.  I&#8217;d be more interested in recommendations based on my OPML.  </p>
	<p>Now, if the tool measured how much time I spent on any given post (relative to its length), that might say something more about the attention and interestingness than whether I&#8217;ve marked it or not&#8230;.  But then, maybe I am dreaming.</p>
	<p>Jack
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Laurence Timms</title>
		<link>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/01/20/rojo-functionality-and-attention-data/#comment-18476</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://libraryclips.blogsome.com/2006/01/20/rojo-functionality-and-attention-data/#comment-18476</guid>
					<description>I'm the guy that wrote chuquet.com (under 'Social', paragraph 5, folks). Yes, it's based around link attention rather than feed attention, but chuquet lets you immediately read summaries of all feed content relating to a link. Links to the feeds and the articles are all available in context too.

Right now you can submit new feeds to chuquet, but not as a personal view. It's for everyone's benefit. In future there will be a personal view of chuquet which will refer to your opml, your own blog and your tags to tune what you see.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m the guy that wrote chuquet.com (under &#8216;Social&#8217;, paragraph 5, folks). Yes, it&#8217;s based around link attention rather than feed attention, but chuquet lets you immediately read summaries of all feed content relating to a link. Links to the feeds and the articles are all available in context too.</p>
	<p>Right now you can submit new feeds to chuquet, but not as a personal view. It&#8217;s for everyone&#8217;s benefit. In future there will be a personal view of chuquet which will refer to your opml, your own blog and your tags to tune what you see.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
